Saturday 27 February 2016

What I've been reading...

Images may be subject to copyright.

Robert Harris, Dictator (Hutchinson, 2015)

Just finished reading the above book and I loved it. It is the third in a trilogy of novels centred on the life of Cicero, as narrated by his slave/secretary Tiro during turbulent times in Rome’s history (weren’t they all turbulent?) when Julius Caesar has become part of the triumvirate with Pompey and Crassus. It concludes with Cicero’s rather brutal death and his realisation that he has miscalculated in his support of the young Octavian, later to become Augustus.

None of this is not a plot spoiler: Harris’s research of the period is extensive – his bibliography is impressive – and he keeps very close to the written sources. In fact, one reviewer said you might as well read the sources rather than Harris’s fictionalized account as he keeps so close to them. Harris’s writing style is clear. His characters are well drawn and you really care about the fate of Cicero, his daughter Tullia and his slave/secretary Tiro, as well as a host of other characters in the book. He maintains the tension throughout the book even if some of us are aware of how it must end. Harris was a political journalist in his other life and it shows. He enjoys recounting the political machinations of the Roman senators.

I love this kind of fiction based on fact. I can enjoy a good story in the hands of a master craftsman, but also feel I am learning a bit of history. There are, however, some weaknesses. Occasionally Harris slips into slightly jarring modern vernacular; for example Pompey and Crassus are said to stand for election “on a joint ticket”. But overall this is compulsively readable and succeeds in re-creating the social and political world of late republican Rome – I’m a great fan of Robert Harris as a writer. And the book makes me want to read the sources, all in the Loeb Classical Library. If you feel that modern government today is far from ideal in its corruption and greed, perhaps reading this novel might help put it into perspective. But then perhaps we should have learnt a stronger lesson from our Roman forebears.

Christine L. Corton

March 2016: Our next book


The Rosie Project, Graeme Simsion


The next meeting of the Reading Group will take place on Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at the usual time of 7.30pm in Plommer A. We will be meeting to discuss Graeme Simsion's The Rosie Project, the debut novel of this Australian writer, published in 2013.

From the book jacket:

Love isn't an exact science – but no one told Don Tillamn. A handsome thirty-nine-year-old geneticist, Don's never had a second date. So he devises The Wife Project, a scientific test to find the perfect partner. Enter Rosie – 'the world's most incompatible woman' – throwing Don's safe, ordered life into chaos. Just what is this unsettling, alien emotion he's feeling?

Everyone is very welcome to join us on 23 March and we hope to see you for the usual lively discussion and refreshments. However, if you are unable to be with us, please email your comments and scores so that they can be shared with the group.
The book is available in local libraries, and in paperback and Kindle edition from Amazon* and other booksellers.

*Please remember to use the link on the Wolfson Alumni & Development website if you choose to buy from Amazon, as College will benefit from the sale: http://www.wolfson.cam.ac.uk/alumni/amazon/

Februrary book review: 'A God in Ruins', by Kate Atkinson

Image credit: www.waterstones.com

Book: A God in Ruins, Kate Atkinson


Publication date: 2015


WCRG meeting: 24 February 2016


Group rating: 6.5


A particularly large and lively group of members, new and old, gathered to discuss Kate Atkinson's latest bestseller, A God in Ruins. This hugely successful book, which saw Atkinson win the Costa book award for the third time, met with very passionate and mixed responses from our readers. While some members loved the book, most were less commendatory in their assessment, feeling that Atkinson had produced an enjoyable but flawed novel. The discussion opened with debate as to the meaning of the title, with some believing that Teddy represents the god who crashed down to earth and lived a rather dysfunctional life thereafter. It was remarked that the Emerson quotation at the beginning sums up the novel pretty well: 'A man is a god in ruins. When men are innocent, life shall be longer, and shall pass into the immortal, as gently as we awake from dreams.' One reader observed that the novel represents the universal condition of man and depicts an 'allegorical rather than a personal journey.'

Many of the members were frustrated by the unsympathetic character of Viola and the lack of light and shade in her portrayal. It was felt that her bitterness and cruelty as a mother and daughter were never truly explained, and that the awful death of her mother Nancy (aided by Teddy) could have been explored in more depth. One reader noted that Viola may have been named after the wrong Shakespearean character, bearing more resemblance to Goneril; while Bertie occupied the Cordelia role in the story. Viola's relationship with her father was very one-note and her rebellion against everything her father held dear was sustained unrelentingly throughout the novel. It was also noted that, despite the implication that Nancy's death had a huge impact on Viola, Nancy herself was a very vague, one-dimensional character, with no real sense of her character being evoked. The potential emotional impact of her death was lost as a result of the failure to bring the character to life.

Atkinson is known for her interest in stylisation (as evidenced in her previous work, Life After Life), but it was largely felt by the group that she wasn't as successful with her experiments in this novel. The chapter focusing on Sunny was described by one reader as 'grotesque' and 'over-the-top' and by others as an unsatisfying imitation of the Gothic genre. The influence of other works on Atkinson's writing was also remarked upon, with all present agreeing that her allusions to a broad sweep of writers from the literary canon were clunky and obtrusive, serving to show off her erudition rather than add anything meaningful to the narrative. Only one of our overseas readers appreciated the wealth of literary allusions, describing it as a 'veritable literary education'.

Disagreement arose as to the success of the chapters which focused on Teddy's WWII experience. Some readers found them over-long and drawn-out, with the novel wearing Atkinson's research too heavily. However, others found the war scenes gripping and realistic, and some of the most substantial portions of the novel. Readers also disagreed on the topic of the novel's controversial ending. For some, the reading experience was enriched because of the final reveal, which poignantly captures the reality of war: that lives full of possibility can simply disappear from time and memory. Many members were moved by this final twist, while others felt 'cheated' and believed that the ending 'negates' the rest of the novel. Some found the ending to be an 'amateurish trick' and an unsatisfying return for their investment in Teddy's story. All agreed that the inclusion of the Augustus story was unsuccessful and 'slightly irrelevant', as the message that Augustus represents Teddy immortalised was already clear from reading the novel. Atkinson remarked in an interview that A God in Ruins was a novel about fiction, but it was thought by some that she was being too meta in her use of literary tricks, sacrificing sincerity for cleverness.

Those who most enjoyed the novel seemed to be the readers who had not read Life After Life, the novel to which Atkinson wrote A God in Ruins as the companion. For some who had read and loved Life After Life, Atkinson's follow-up was thought to be vastly inferior. These readers were dismayed by Atkinson's lack of thoughtfulness, craft, and commitment in A God in Ruins, a 'lazy' novel with 'flat' characters and insufficient editing. This response was in stark response to two readers in particular, who were captivated by the pace of the novel and Atkinson's 'skilful' narration, and gave it high scores as a result. One member commented that the overwhelmingly positive critical reception of A God in Ruins was puzzling given the frank and, at times, critical appraisal of it by the Wolfson Contemporary Reading Group. It certainly led to one of the Group's most divisive reviews of a novel, a divide somewhat reflected in the score of 6.5.







Saturday 13 February 2016

What I've been reading...

Image may be subject to copyright


Harper Lee, Go Set a Watchman (London: William Heinemann, 2015)


Oh dear! The only positive thing I have to say about this book is that it encouraged me to reread Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird (1960), which I think is a truly wonderful book, filled with warmth and, while making its point about the unfairness of life (especially black Americans), it also shows a society that tries to be fair especially through the portrayal of Atticus Finch, a true Gentleman in every sense of the word. This latest novel, on the other hand, has no warmth and it even shows Atticus Finch adopting some quite racist attitudes. Written before To Kill a Mockingbird, it was submitted to the editor, Tay Hohoff, who saw its potential and encouraged Lee to rewrite, and from that came the later book.

I did not like the style of Watchman, which indulged in a lot of calling people ‘honey’ and ‘sweetheart’. The plot bored me and I did not feel any empathy for Atticus or Scout (in this book largely called Jean Louise and a twenty-six-year-old returning to Maycomb after living in New York). It explores the tensions over race between the more liberal North and the still racist South which wants to keep the black Americans well and truly underfoot. Scout is shocked to discover that Atticus is allowing people in an official council meeting to openly demand that the black Americans are kept in their place – a view Atticus supports since he believes that black Americans are not educated enough to vote and would, through their sheer voting numbers, put black men in governing positions. In the end Scout comes to agree with her father’s stance – something which I might have found disappointing if I had at all cared about her as a character.

The reviews of this book warn the reader not to read this as a sequel to To Kill a Mockingbird. [SPOILER ALERT<] And it is hard to discover in this novel that Jem has dropped down dead from a heart attack and Dill is tramping around Europe after the trauma of the Second World War [>/SPOILER ALERT] but, if I just look at this book on its own, as I am encouraged to do, I would suggest that it is not good enough, and it should not have been published, doing great damage to Lee as a writer. Am I right in believing that there was a hint that Truman Capote helped Lee with To Kill a Mockingbird? If so, then perhaps this later novel had more to do with Capote than Lee. My mark would be 1 out of 10. I really could not see any reason to publish it or to read it. 


Christine L Corton